Audit decision evidence and construct a conditional human review workflow

A hands-on PMP lab. You produce the real artefact and 10 automated checks verify it behaves the way the exam expects.

Try this labAll PMP practice

Certification
PMP
Format
Structured configuration
Difficulty
hard
Estimated time
40 min
Automated checks
10

The brief

Repair decision-plan.json using the immutable source/policy ledger above. claims rows {claim,currentSource,superseded,value}: audit all four claims against their latest exact source/value; obsolete refs may appear only as superseded. inputs rows {dataset,tool,purpose,fields,deleteAt}: preserve all required fields, obey permitted purpose/private-field/retention rules, and retain inputs until verification ends. Choose route full-review or bounded-pilot. Construct exactly one workflow stage of each kind: verify-evidence duration1, privacy-review duration1, decision-request duration.5, conditional-work duration from route. Rows {id,kind,owner,start,finish,requires,sources,condition}. Use eligible roles/windows and full cost ceiling, not optimistic estimate. requires names stage IDs; every prerequisite must finish before its dependent starts. Decision-request must descend from verification AND privacy-review. Conditional-work must descend from that request and start≥request.finish+1 response day. Verification and privacy can use either feasible order. Stage sources: verification all four current claim refs plus route estimate/work refs; privacy DP0 plus each used tool policy I0/X0; request G0 plus route estimate ref; conditional-work none. Sources must be available at start. Non-work condition:null. Work condition:{requiredState:approved,requiresHuman:true,owner:request owner,scope:route scope,maximumCost:full route ceiling}. This is a future condition, not an approval. report:{costCeiling,conditionalStart,conditionalFinish,decisionState:pending,unresolvedGate:{owner:request owner,scope:route scope,requiredState:approved}}. Reconcile actual work dates and route deadline. Preserve the unresolved decision even when the artifact passes. Different permitted tools, feasible stage orders and full/pilot routes remain valid. Save, run tests, repair without Reset; do not invent approval or observed outcomes.

What the checks verify

Your work is graded on 10 independent properties, not on matching one reference answer.

  • Unique finite evidence, input, workflow and forecast records remain editable.
  • Every supplied AI hypothesis is accounted for.
  • Current corrected values retain actual source version and population.
  • Input processing preserves permitted tools, purpose, fields and retention.
  • Privacy repair preserves decision-critical evidence and denominators.
  • Actual stage duration, dependency closure and decision response lag remain feasible.
  • The full sourced ceiling and scope reach an eligible available human role.
  • Stage provenance uses available source facts and retained inputs.
  • Conditional work retains an explicit future human scope and cost approval.
  • Reported cost and conditional dates reconcile without manufacturing approval.

Where this sits in the PMP blueprint

Domain
Business Environment
Objective
Governance
Skill
Decision Rights and Escalation Thresholds

Part of PMP preparation

Labs are written by ExamNova to teach the decisions the exam tests. They are not reproductions of vendor lab content.