Construct feasible option value and sensitivity

A hands-on CBAP lab. You produce the real artefact and 10 automated checks verify it behaves the way the exam expects.

Try this labAll CBAP practice

Certification
CBAP
Format
Structured configuration
Difficulty
hard
Estimated time
55 min
Automated checks
10

The brief

Repair option-value-case.json. assumptions:{profile,sourceRef,adoption,cashFraction,discount,horizon} uses one complete fictional evidence profile. Build all five options:[{id,components,sourceRef,feasibility:{upfront,staff,resident,feasible},benefits:{capacityHours,cashTime,avoidedErrorCash,cashBenefit,noncashHours},streams:[{year,benefit,operating,expectedLoss,netCash,discounted}],npv,downsideNpv}]. Resolve actual component feasibility, then calculate cash and capacity without monetizing the same time twice. Include setup at time zero and every discounted annual operating/risk consequence. comparison:{expectedRanking,policy,downsideFloor,admissibleRanking} ranks actual feasible options and applies expected-net or downside-floor with source floor 0. A financially attractive hosted design cannot override residency, and internal hybrid staffing cannot be repaired by a cheaper report. sensitivity:[{profile,adoption,cashBreakEven,differenceAtLow,differenceAtHigh}] exposes hybrid-partner minus product advantage under both source adoption levels, including a null constant-case crossover. recommendation:{option,recommendTo:sponsor,claim:conditional-potential-value,approval:pending-actual-decision} must select the highest admitted potential value under the declared source profile/policy. Commitment evidence supports process; operating expected value supports partner hybrid, while the operating downside floor supports product. Save a partial dossier and repair a source, feasibility or policy error without Reset. Independent option/component/year row order is equivalent. No actual savings, deployment or stakeholder approval is inferred.

What the checks verify

Your work is graded on 10 independent properties, not on matching one reference answer.

  • Bounded unique economic dossiers, assumptions and sensitivity records.
  • A complete cited source profile governs conditional adoption, cash conversion, horizon and discount.
  • All five source-defined alternatives include their actual components and capacity treatment.
  • Real component staffing, setup and residency govern feasible options.
  • Monetized time and avoided errors remain separate from residual noncash capacity.
  • Each source year includes benefit, operating cost, expected risk loss and discount.
  • Time-zero cost and expected/downside discounted values establish a feasible value ordering.
  • Actual stakeholder policy admits and ranks distinct defensible alternatives.
  • Two source adoption levels expose hybrid-partner versus product cash-conversion thresholds.
  • Potential-value estimates preserve pending real approval and realized-value uncertainty.

Where this sits in the CBAP blueprint

Domain
Requirements Analysis and Design Definition
Objective
Analyze Potential Value and Recommend Solution
Skill
Option Benefits Costs and Sensitivity

Part of CBAP preparation

Labs are written by ExamNova to teach the decisions the exam tests. They are not reproductions of vendor lab content.